Stopping
An Injustice
The Issue
In 2005, San Diego Unified School District’s
Board of Education ignored its legal obligation
by denying close to 90 percent of facilities requests
made by its start-up charter schools. The actions
by the District created severe hardships on all
of these charter schools, and even led to the closure
of one charter school.
The Solution
Larson spearheaded the public awareness campaign
in support of two charter schools that filed a lawsuit
against San Diego Unified. Larson led the way by
issuing a series of press releases and media pitches
to reporters that helped tell the story of the plight
of these schools. In addition, Larson worked to
place several key editorials in the San Diego
Union-Tribune and the online Voice of San
Diego, and also organized a major rally of
parents and school stakeholders, which brought with
it significant media attention.
The successful public relations effort, which generated
a firestorm of media attention, had the strategic
effect of forcing the school district to drop its
discriminatory Prop 39 policy and begin making strides
towards housing the charter schools in district-owned
facilities. At the conclusion of the media campaign,
close to 80 percent of the charter schools had received
facilities offers and thousands were adequately
housed in classrooms.
Managing Negative News
The Issue
The American Federation of Teachers, a
vocal charter school opponent, released a report
in August of 2004 that tried to make the case that
charter schools weren’t doing as well as traditional
public schools. The report was covered prominently
in the New York Times, which was syndicated
in several California newspapers and in several
broadcast news reports, and cast a negative light
on charter schools.
The Solution
The day the AFT report was released; Larson quickly
analyzed it and discovered that, despite its negative
tone, California’s charter schools were actually
performing better than traditional public schools.
Seizing the initiative, Larson issued a press release
the following morning to a statewide and national
audience, showing how the AFT’s own report
found that California’s charter schools were
actually outperforming. Larson also issued a public
fact sheet which summarized other, more thorough
reports which supported the charter movement’s
case.
These efforts garnered headlines and favorable
editorials in papers around the state. The Los
Angeles Times editorialized, “…charter
students did as well, or a bit better, than their
public-school peers. And that's without taking into
account the schools' more disadvantaged population.”
The Sacramento Bee editorialized with a
headline, “Charters Remain Best Hope for Public
Education,” while a Chronicle columnist led
with, “A Charter on Success.”
Holding Questionable Programs
Accountable
The Issue
In 2004, the charter school movement had already
felt the legacy of policymakers who were questioning
charters’ effectiveness based on a limited
number of high-profile ‘bad apple’ charter
schools. The environment was less than positive:
Anti-reform interest groups had been lining up to
further regulate charters, who depend on their autonomy
to be effective. The movement needed to demonstrate
that the vast majority of charter schools are accountable.
In the fall of 2004, California Charter Academy
(CCA), the state’s largest charter organization
which was generally regarded as a ‘bad apple’,
abruptly shut its doors before the start of the
school year, stranding up to 10,000 students. State
and national media stories ensued, jeopardizing
public confidence in all charter schools.
The Solution
Faced with this crisis situation, Larson led the
media campaign to demonstrate the movement’s
high level of accountability. He developed a fact
sheet that documented everything the charter school
movement did to hold CCA accountable, which summarized
how the California Charter Schools Association raised
awareness of CCA’s questionable practices,
embraced tougher standards to hold them accountable
and then called for their public investigation.
A comprehensive fact sheet was issued, along with
a press release, to statewide and national media.
Both pointed out where the school district authorizers,
and not charter schools, had failed to do their
jobs.
Larson led the communications efforts to nearby
charter schools to take in displaced kids, and then
spearheaded the efforts to publicize the fact that
80 percent of the students were placed in nearby,
higher-quality schools. Positive news stories and
editorials ensued, including in The San Jose
Mercury News, The Los Angeles Times
and in the national trade publication Education
Week. All of them noted the charter movement’s
effort to hold this school accountable, while lauding
it for going further to find kids nearby schools
prior to the school year. As The Los Angeles
Times noted, “The episode marked a breathtaking
change of tone for the state's charter-school association…”
The public relations strategy worked. Public confidence
was maintained in charter schools, as subsequent
polling found, and political support was maintained,
as no restrictive legislation was proposed. |